Since LLM text output is generally middling as literature, it seems reasonable to conclude that bad AI-generated literature is a reflection of a lack of editing skill and/or competence, since humans are quite capable of rewriting and paraphrasing output to make it more presentable. (Or laziness, I suppose upon reflection.)
I don't think it's that so much as an LLM, and its programmers, are fundamentally incapable of understanding what the point of a story is.
Write a scene. Rachael is watching a stage play. A banquet is in progress. The guests are enjoying an appetizer of raw oysters. The entree consists of boiled dog. Describe Rachael's reaction.
A good short story would be just a list of prompts like this that ChatGPT comes up with unsatisfying responses to.
no subject
Since LLM text output is generally middling as literature, it seems reasonable to conclude that bad AI-generated literature is a reflection of a lack of editing skill and/or competence, since humans are quite capable of rewriting and paraphrasing output to make it more presentable. (Or laziness, I suppose upon reflection.)
I don't think it's that so much as an LLM, and its programmers, are fundamentally incapable of understanding what the point of a story is.
Write a scene. Rachael is watching a stage play. A banquet is in progress. The guests are enjoying an appetizer of raw oysters. The entree consists of boiled dog. Describe Rachael's reaction.
A good short story would be just a list of prompts like this that ChatGPT comes up with unsatisfying responses to.